{"id":4704,"date":"2024-06-26T11:05:37","date_gmt":"2024-06-26T09:05:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ethik-der-textkulturen.de\/etk\/?p=4704"},"modified":"2024-06-26T11:07:33","modified_gmt":"2024-06-26T09:07:33","slug":"30-09-02-10-2024-international-conference-digitality-and-the-public-sphere-literature-mediality-practice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ethik-der-textkulturen.de\/etk\/30-09-02-10-2024-international-conference-digitality-and-the-public-sphere-literature-mediality-practice\/","title":{"rendered":"30.09.-02.10.2024 International Conference „Digitality and the Public Sphere: Literature, Mediality, Practice“"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

FAU Erlangen-N\u00fcrnberg, GRK Literatur und \u00d6ffentlichkeit<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keynote: N. Katherine Hayles<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

At this moment of our present time, processes of digitalization are leading to a profound transformation of social environments<\/strong>. Digitalization impacts the economic, cultural, and historic conditions of the lives we live and the ways we socially interact, communicate, and self-reflect. The turn towards the digital informs cultural structures and practices, it shapes forms of knowledge production and dissemination, and it alters the very fabric of the public sphere. An increasing pluralization and differentiation of public spaces of communication raises renewed questions over the loss of an imagined consensus as well as new potentialities for processes of cultural production, their changing social, political, and cultural functions, and their ethical implications<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Literature, in its extended sense of textuality, cultural production, and history of material practices, is deeply entangled in the structural shift towards digitality. As circumstances of production and reception change, a general reinterpretation of literature as such, its role and functionality, its possibilities or potential \u201cdeath\u201d ensues. At the same time, literature itself engages in reflections on the opportunities, challenges, and potential risks of the profound shift towards digitality, as digital media forge new literary forms, conventions, and aesthetic practices. Engaging with social change on the level of content, form, and models of engagement, literature actively positions itself and intervenes in the collective imagination and the shaping of processes of exchange between public spheres and new, digital frontiers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Research Training Group \u201cLiterature and the Public Sphere in Contemporary Differentiated Cultures,\u201d<\/strong> funded by the German Research Foundation, investigates the interconnections between various literatures and various publics in multilayered and heterogenous subnational and cross-national social environments since the mid-20th<\/sup> century.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The international conference aims at investigating the diverse interrelations of literature, the public, and the digital<\/strong> through concrete case studies and readings that elucidate the medial constitution, processes of communication, social conditions, and various functions of literary phenomena.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Monday, September 30, 2024<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
14:00<\/td>Sabine Friedrich, Svenja Hagenhoff, Karin Hoepker Welcome & Introduction<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
14:30<\/td>Panel 1: <\/strong>Generating Attention: The Search for Visibility, Emotional Connection, and Authenticity<\/strong> Niels Penke (Siegen): tba Birte Christ (Giessen): Gen Z Women\u2019s Instapoetry as Feminist Life Writing: Genre Hybridity, Screen\/Book Materiality, and Cross-National Publics Marcella Fassio (FU Berlin): Performances of Melancholy and Intimacy on Social Media \u2013 Sad Girl Aesthetic and Digital Feminism<\/td><\/tr>
17.30<\/td>Poster Exhibition & Reception<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Tuesday, October 01, 2023<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
09:00<\/td>Panel 2: <\/strong>Public Conditions of Literary Production: Digitality, Popularity, Subversion<\/strong> Thomas Ernst (Antwerp): Platform Power and Digital Literacy: Web Literary Studies as a Critical Discipline Katherine Deane (Birmingham): From Mass Market to Niche Market: Cultivating Reader Publics in Self-Published Popular Romance Nils Matzner (Hamburg) & Matthias Wieser (Klagenfurt): Public Literary Criticism and Digital Publics \u2013 The Case of the Bachmannpreis<\/td><\/tr>
11:00<\/td>Coffee Break<\/td><\/tr>
11:30<\/td>Panel 3: <\/strong>Literature, Materialities, and the Virtual: Objects, Roles, Concepts of Creativity<\/strong> Philipp Sch\u00f6nthaler (Independent): New Romantic Configurations of Machine Writing Jenifer Becker (Hildesheim): AI and the Rise of Pulp Fiction Simon Roloff (L\u00fcneburg): Aggregates of Creation: Authorship and the Work of Writing with Artificial Intelligence<\/td><\/tr>
13:30<\/td>Lunch<\/td><\/tr>
14:30<\/td>Panel 4: <\/strong>Literary Reflection and Digital Literacy<\/strong> Daniel Escandell Montiel (Salamanca): tba Pola Gro\u00df (ZfL Berlin): Deep Dreaming\u201d \u2212 Monika Rinck, Hannes Bajohr and Chat GPT Nina Tolksdorf (FU Berlin): On the Mobility of Literary Texts in Digital Media<\/td><\/tr>
17:30<\/td>Keynote<\/strong> N. Katherine Hayles<\/td><\/tr>
19:30<\/td>Conference Dinner (Alter Simpl)<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Wednesday, October 02, 2024<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
08:30<\/td>Panel 5: <\/strong>Literary Knowledge Production: Narrative, Creation, and Circulation<\/strong> Hanna Hamel (ZfL Berlin): Staying in Touch. New Forms of Paratextuality in Writing with AI L. Emilio L\u00f3pez Maytorena (Freiburg): Fan Faction. On Conspiratorial Agony Hendrikje Schauer (Jena): Literature and the Public Sphere: An Archival Case Study from the 1950s<\/td><\/tr>
10:30<\/td>Coffee Break<\/td><\/tr>
11:30<\/td>Panel 6: <\/strong>Ethics & Politics: The Politics of Belonging and Exclusion<\/strong> Carolin Amlinger (Basel): Aesthetic Openness and Social Exclusion. New Patterns of Distinction in the Literary Sphere Anne M\u00f6ls\u00e4 (Tampere): Disruptions in a Weakly Professionalized Field: Finnish Publishers\u2019 Work Ethics in the Critical Period of Digitalization Anya Shchetvina (HU Berlin): Global by Design, Local by Default: Internet Manifestos and their Publics<\/td><\/tr>
13:00<\/td>Conclusion<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Panel 1: Generating Attention: The Search for Visibility, Emotional Connection, and Authenticity<\/h5>\n\n\n\n

The public nature of literature produces different strategies for attracting attention. They relate to the selection and use of media, especially the internet, but also to the presentation, the launch by opinion leaders, the politics of the work or the (self-)staging of the authors. Attention-grabbing factors such as commodity aesthetics, advertising, ranking\/rating, but also scandals prove to be extremely relevant for the understanding of cultural artifacts, their perception by the public and their reception.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Panel 2: Public Conditions of Literary Production: Digitality, Popularity, Subversion<\/h5>\n\n\n\n

Literary communication is not solely based on the spontaneous, free behavior of individuals and organizations as actors, but is contextualized, takes place in a system-bound manner and is conditional. Conditions affect communication by enabling, privileging, demanding or preventing production or distribution of literature. They result from the cultural self-image, the political constitution and the other functional systems of a society as well as from the technological possibilities, and they are characterized by historical developments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Panel 3: Literature, Materialities, and the Virtual: Objects, Roles, Concepts of Creativity<\/h5>\n\n\n\n

The digitalization of literatures in the present day \u2013 more precisely of reading, writing and publishing \u2013 calls into question long-established concepts such as the printed book, the first edition, the original, authorship, intellectual property, the completed work, even the individual page, or changes its noticeability, function, \u2018dignity\u2019 and perception in the public sphere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Panel 4: Literary Reflection and Digital Literacy<\/h5>\n\n\n\n

The structure of literary texts has undergone significant changes with digitalization. Conventional categories such as author, reader, and text are undergoing a fundamental revision and are being redefined. Literary texts are both shaped by these changes and also reflect deeply on these processes. These two aspects \u2013 restructuring and processes of reflection \u2013 will be the focus of this panel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Panel 5: : Literary Knowledge Production: Narrative, Creation, and Circulation<\/h5>\n\n\n\n

Literatures not only have the capacity to hold canonical knowledge at different levels of comprehensibility for the public and thus function as archives of their own kind, but also to produce alternative or subversive knowledge and offer it to different publics of the second and third spheres. Literatures present themselves as centers for the preservation and processing of cultures, their own media and their differentiated practices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Panel 6: Ethics & Politics: The Politics of Belonging and Exclusion<\/h5>\n\n\n\n

Without wanting to reduce literature to a partial or substitute discipline of politics or philosophy, at least in modern societies it must be recognized as having a genuinely public responsibility, its own critical potential and its own forms of aesthetic resistance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Organized by<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Sabine Friedrich<\/a>, Svenja Hagenhoff<\/a>, Karin H\u00f6pker<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The international conference aims at investigating the diverse interrelations of literature, the public, and the digital through concrete case studies and readings that elucidate […]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":4724,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ethik-der-textkulturen.de\/etk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4704"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ethik-der-textkulturen.de\/etk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ethik-der-textkulturen.de\/etk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ethik-der-textkulturen.de\/etk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ethik-der-textkulturen.de\/etk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4704"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/ethik-der-textkulturen.de\/etk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4704\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4726,"href":"https:\/\/ethik-der-textkulturen.de\/etk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4704\/revisions\/4726"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ethik-der-textkulturen.de\/etk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4724"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ethik-der-textkulturen.de\/etk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4704"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ethik-der-textkulturen.de\/etk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4704"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ethik-der-textkulturen.de\/etk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4704"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}